In order to get something done, maybe we need to think less. Seems counter-intuitive, but I believe sometimes our thoughts can get in the way of the creative process. We can work better at times when we "tune out" the external world and focus on what's in front of us.
While this certainly could have been written by a human being, he or she would not have been an informed or well-educated example of our species. The piece is mostly unsupported generalizations and outright fabrications. It's also tedious, repetitive and largely without anything useful to say. It makes assertions any responsible author would know require references or citations, and then deploys them as the basis for ham-fisted suggestions and half-baked advice. And the use of the first-person perspective is so plodding and pedestrian that it invites “creative thinking” to discover some trajectory away from finishing the article.
For a person who do not know much about AI, I did not feel at any point that its not written by a human. But I hated this writer because he is not giving any evidence of his claims...
I ran this through the Hemingway App and got a grade 7 score, which is good. To really understand that this is written by an AI, I needed to read it twice.
If I didn’t know that it was AI ? But what was said is true and maybe this should be sent out to the public without telling them first Maybe everyone ! Just Maybe !they will think for their Self instead of being a follower and really make a difference.
It's not very pleasant to refer to the individual person who wrote this as "a machine." Certainly, while seated in one's favorite furniture, enjoying the light afternoon, upon reading, and perhaps even sipping a nice warm cup of chai, one might observe that his prose is a bit verbose, but that is all cool in the gang, and in some opinions, it is exactly what is up.
Reads exactly like 99% of the bullshit you find on hackernews and medium - well done!
GPT 3 does it once again ;)
GPT-3 come to Beşiktaş
While this certainly could have been written by a human being, he or she would not have been an informed or well-educated example of our species. The piece is mostly unsupported generalizations and outright fabrications. It's also tedious, repetitive and largely without anything useful to say. It makes assertions any responsible author would know require references or citations, and then deploys them as the basis for ham-fisted suggestions and half-baked advice. And the use of the first-person perspective is so plodding and pedestrian that it invites “creative thinking” to discover some trajectory away from finishing the article.
For a person who do not know much about AI, I did not feel at any point that its not written by a human. But I hated this writer because he is not giving any evidence of his claims...
Does anyone else find ironic that the AI which is going to replace all writers soon or later recommends us to write on a daily base ?
Any sufficiently advanced technology is incapable of using spellcheck: "The more you practice, the better you'll get"
I ran this through the Hemingway App and got a grade 7 score, which is good. To really understand that this is written by an AI, I needed to read it twice.
This is freaking interesting! Some lines lack coherence, though. It's good enough.
mother of muses, sing for me.
This is just recombination of existing texts.
Hahaha this is genious
If I didn’t know that it was AI ? But what was said is true and maybe this should be sent out to the public without telling them first Maybe everyone ! Just Maybe !they will think for their Self instead of being a follower and really make a difference.
It will be remembered in the history as the initiation of AI dominance era over human beings aka just simple biological neuron based cute animals
Prepárense para la singularidad
It's not very pleasant to refer to the individual person who wrote this as "a machine." Certainly, while seated in one's favorite furniture, enjoying the light afternoon, upon reading, and perhaps even sipping a nice warm cup of chai, one might observe that his prose is a bit verbose, but that is all cool in the gang, and in some opinions, it is exactly what is up.