While this certainly could have been written by a human being, he or she would not have been an informed or well-educated example of our species. The piece is mostly unsupported generalizations and outright fabrications. It's also tedious, repetitive and largely without anything useful to say. It makes assertions any responsible author would know require references or citations, and then deploys them as the basis for ham-fisted suggestions and half-baked advice. And the use of the first-person perspective is so plodding and pedestrian that it invites “creative thinking” to discover some trajectory away from finishing the article.
Of course, it did prompt me to spend 30 minutes of my life on this website, so maybe it deserves more credit (if life stealing ever warrants accolades) than I gave it.
For a person who do not know much about AI, I did not feel at any point that its not written by a human. But I hated this writer because he is not giving any evidence of his claims...
This is a recombination of existing texts by a neural network... Since the texts were written by humans, it is of no surprise it looks like a text by humans.
I ran this through the Hemingway App and got a grade 7 score, which is good. To really understand that this is written by an AI, I needed to read it twice.
If I didn’t know that it was AI ? But what was said is true and maybe this should be sent out to the public without telling them first Maybe everyone ! Just Maybe !they will think for their Self instead of being a follower and really make a difference.
You are right, the thing is, the guys who developed this algorithm make it available only for field researchers, but somehow it reached the hands of a normal student. Here is the new it MIT Technology Review
It's not very pleasant to refer to the individual person who wrote this as "a machine." Certainly, while seated in one's favorite furniture, enjoying the light afternoon, upon reading, and perhaps even sipping a nice warm cup of chai, one might observe that his prose is a bit verbose, but that is all cool in the gang, and in some opinions, it is exactly what is up.
Reads exactly like 99% of the bullshit you find on hackernews and medium - well done!
Best comment ever.
GPT 3 does it once again ;)
GPT-3 come to Beşiktaş
Beşiktaşda ne yapacak? Ankarada saraya gitsin, o zaman uygun bir hükümete sahip oluruz...
😂😂😂😂
While this certainly could have been written by a human being, he or she would not have been an informed or well-educated example of our species. The piece is mostly unsupported generalizations and outright fabrications. It's also tedious, repetitive and largely without anything useful to say. It makes assertions any responsible author would know require references or citations, and then deploys them as the basis for ham-fisted suggestions and half-baked advice. And the use of the first-person perspective is so plodding and pedestrian that it invites “creative thinking” to discover some trajectory away from finishing the article.
Of course, it did prompt me to spend 30 minutes of my life on this website, so maybe it deserves more credit (if life stealing ever warrants accolades) than I gave it.
For a person who do not know much about AI, I did not feel at any point that its not written by a human. But I hated this writer because he is not giving any evidence of his claims...
This is a recombination of existing texts by a neural network... Since the texts were written by humans, it is of no surprise it looks like a text by humans.
Does anyone else find ironic that the AI which is going to replace all writers soon or later recommends us to write on a daily base ?
Any sufficiently advanced technology is incapable of using spellcheck: "The more you practice, the better you'll get"
I ran this through the Hemingway App and got a grade 7 score, which is good. To really understand that this is written by an AI, I needed to read it twice.
This is freaking interesting! Some lines lack coherence, though. It's good enough.
mother of muses, sing for me.
This is just recombination of existing texts.
Hahaha this is genious
If I didn’t know that it was AI ? But what was said is true and maybe this should be sent out to the public without telling them first Maybe everyone ! Just Maybe !they will think for their Self instead of being a follower and really make a difference.
You are right, the thing is, the guys who developed this algorithm make it available only for field researchers, but somehow it reached the hands of a normal student. Here is the new it MIT Technology Review
https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/08/14/1006780/ai-gpt-3-fake-blog-reached-top-of-hacker-news
It will be remembered in the history as the initiation of AI dominance era over human beings aka just simple biological neuron based cute animals
Prepárense para la singularidad
It's not very pleasant to refer to the individual person who wrote this as "a machine." Certainly, while seated in one's favorite furniture, enjoying the light afternoon, upon reading, and perhaps even sipping a nice warm cup of chai, one might observe that his prose is a bit verbose, but that is all cool in the gang, and in some opinions, it is exactly what is up.